This means that it's easier to close a bunch of tabs quickly in Seamonkey, and overall space is saved, because in Firefox there's an X at the end of every tab, until you get more than a couple open, at which point the Xes only appear when you actually select the tab. In Firefox, each tab has its own "close" button on the tab. The two are very similar now, with the tab bar and a dropdown button at the end to show the complete list of currently open tabs, but Seamonkey has only one "close tab" button, at the very end of the tab bar, and it's always there. I also like Seamonkey's tab management a little more. That also makes it possible to see your entire bookmark collection all on one list in Seamonkey, but not in Firefox. I'm much more used to Seamonkey's design, and think it works for a bookmarks manager - it is useful to be able to see multiple subfolders all open on the list at once, when each one has only a small amount of stuff in it. Firefox uses a more Windows Explorer-like design, with a folder tree that only displays the current folder in the main window. Seamonkey still has dropdown tabs in the bookmarks manager, so everything is listed together, but it also has a sidebar with a list of all the folders, so you can see the organization and quickly go to anything. I can see advantages and disadvantages to each design.Īs for the bookmarks manager (library, in Firefox), they are similar to the above menu, but a bit different. You can see only the currently selected thing (on the left bar) in the main right window. If you do open the history, each history window works differently - Seamonkey has a single window with dropdown tabs, like in Seamonkey's Bookmarks window, while Firefox uses a window with a left sidebar with the day/date/etc choices. Both have "recently closed tabs" and "recently closed windows" menu items, with lists, available from the Go (Seamonkey) or History (Firefox) menus though. With Seamonkey though, you have to open the History window, accessible from the Go menu, to get the history. It's got the options menu (Preferences) in Edit instead of Tools, for instance, as Netscape used to do (Firefox's location comes from IE), and has a few more things in Tools, such as a direct link to the Password and Data Managers, which can be useful in Firefox you have to go into tabs in the Options (Preferences in Seamonkey) window to get to that stuff.Īnother menu difference (and this is just a difference, not a Seamonkey advantage) is that in Firefox, History is an item on the menubar, so you can see recent history there. I'm also used to it more, so I know where to find things. As a result of this wider bar, the interface does take up a bit more of the screen than Firefox's. Seamonkey has a classic design, so it's got the big Forward, Back, Reload, and Stop buttons to the left of the address bar, for instance. As a result, I like the layout and design of the menus better in Seamonkey. What do I like more about it? Well, for one thing I'm used to its look and interface - Seamonkey uses the classic Netscape-style interface and menu design, while Firefox uses an Internet Explorer-inspired design. It runs on a version of the same Mozilla core, many plugins work on both browsers, etc. So, anyway, Seamonkey is a lot like Firefox at its core. I'm just not one of them, I'm more used to Seamonkey, and I like some of its options too. I'm sure many people will prefer the slicker, more "modern" look of Firefox or especially Chrome. Note that I certainly don't think everyone will like it more of course they won't. Once I started, I thought that it was interesting that there was so much to say, so hopefully it's worth posting. But I was asked recently why I still use Seamonkey, and not Firefox (or Chrome), and I compiled a bunch of interface and design differences between the two browsers that explain why I like it more. There have been changes to both Seamonkey and Firefox in recent years, because of changes from Firefox that Seamonkey has incorporated, but for anyone who knows the browsers, this isn't anything new. Yeah, nothing here (in this post)'s new, really. (I won't be mentioning IE again, but should I even need to say why IE has always been bad? I don't think so.) But I don't use any of those, I use Seamonkey. Right now, three web browsers are dominant, Firefox, Chrome, and Internet Explorer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |